D
April 21, 2026 at 6:18:16 PM
Hi apologies for the intrusion but your typology rentry has been bothering me for a good while and I have to say something š
feel free to not take my advice.
You cannot be 267 since 6 and 7 both belong to head triad! I suggest checking out gut triad (enneagram 1, 8, 9) and choosing from that, and also deciding from 6 or 7 (a good example of a valid tritype is, for example 358, as 3 falls into heart, 5 into head and 8 into gut triad).
You also cannot be SLOAI and [S]cO/I/E, they fall into the same typology system (big 5) and contradict (C/L & A/E), finding information on this may be hard so I recommend this website: https://similarminds.com/global5/rcoai.html to get started, you can look through all the descriptions at the top and find one that suits you best.
And lastly ISFJ and ET(S) contradict as well; ISFJ is MBTI which is very closely tied to the classic jungian system, aka ET(S), which is ESTJ.
If you have a particular reason on why you have typed this way, that's good for you! This is definitely not to be rude- I am just passionate about typology and I want to teach and guide people as much as I am able to. Again, feel free to ignore this if that is what you wish, typology is very likely not your priority and I just wanted to share this. I also apologize for my lengthy message, I have never been good at writing short paragraphs.
Wish you lots of luck and happiness! š
Replied on: April 21, 2026 at 7:04:00 PM
hi!! no worries at all, i do appreciate you taking the time to explain things
i get what you mean about 267, thatās fair!! i hadnāt really thought about the triads like that, so i might look into gut types a bit more and see what fits⦠that said, iām pretty casual about typology overall š i mostly just go with what feels right to me rather than trying to make everything line up perfectly across systems :-) i feel like at the end of the day it has to make sense to me personally more than anything else
i also tend to read into systems separately instead of trying to merge them into one āperfectly consistentā typology, so iām not super strict about things like big 5 or mbti/jungian overlaps matching exactly, i get that might not be how people who are more into typology approach it though!
also thank you for the link!! itās actually really hard to find clear/reliable typology sources sometimes, so i really appreciate it⦠overall thanks for taking the time to leave a message š
and if youāre comfortable with it, could hou leave a contact or somewhere else to reach you? you seem really knowledgeable and iād love to ask you more about typology, my typing, and any sources youād recommend ^_^